Home Flashbox

Johnny Depp’s Toxic Fans Are Review-Bombing Amber Heard’s Expert Witness

Psychiatrist who testified on Monday inundated with hate-spewing reviews

Published by

As Johnny Depp’s defamation trial against ex-wife Amber Heard continues to get ugly in court legally, in the court of public opinion and social media, things appear even more toxic as fans of the actor go on the attack of anyone defending Heard, most recently psychiatrist Dr. David R. Spiegel, MD, who appeared on Monday.

During Spiegel’s testimony, he said that basing his findings on the actor and other’s testimony, that the way Depp’s behaved appeared consistent with someone who has a substance use disorder and someone who is a perpetrator of intimate partner violence, per NBC News. Depp’s legal team countered, questioning the psychiatrist’s ability to assume that without having spoken to Depp. Spiegel responded that he asked to speak with Depp twice and was denied.

Spiegel’s appearance and testimony in court spurred an immediate backlash from scores of toxic people, seeming Depp fans and possible abusers, who inundated social media with negative reviews about a doctor whom they likely know zero about, save for his appearance at the trial, as NBC News’ tech and culture reporter Kat Tenbarge highlighted on Twitter.

The unhinged review posts Tenbarge shared ranged from calling him “terrible” to accusing him of misdiagnoses. “Terrible doctor! I do not recommend this man to anyone,” one wrote in a post Tenbarge shared. Another writes: “He has been unprofessional unpleasant to work with he has mis diagnosed [sic] multiple people with the slightest hint of regret and acts like he know everything he should be avoided at all times.” At press time, on WebMD’s review page, the psychiatrist has been flooded with 1-star reviews that all appear to have been posted following his testimony.

Alongside the deeply troubling consequences the defamation trial has brought on for survivors of domestic abuse, those who testify are also facing undue consequences for speaking their truths in a courtroom while anyone with an opinion can attempt to damage their reputations unfettered via social media and the internet.

From Rolling Stone US.

Recent Posts

Why Tom Holland Rarely Walks Red Carpets With Girlfriend Zendaya

"It's not my moment, it’s her moment," the actor told Men's Health

January 3, 2025

Stormzy Gets Nine-Month Road Ban for Using Cellphone While Driving

The grime star pleaded guilty to the charge and was also fined about $2,400

January 3, 2025

‘Something Is Not Right’: Diddy’s Inner Circle Speaks in New ‘Making of a Bad Boy’ Trailer

Documentary on the embattled music mogul will premiere later this month on Peacock

January 3, 2025

Lupe Fiasco Will Teach Rap at Johns Hopkins’ Peabody Institute

"I’m honored to contribute to this legacy doing what I love most, rap," Fiasco wrote

January 3, 2025

From ‘3 Idiots’ to ‘American Warrior,’ Omi Vaidya Loves Playing The Guy You Hate

‘My goal whenever I come to a role is that I should make the audience…

January 3, 2025

50 Most Anticipated Movies of 2025

Superheroes! Witches! Sequels! Not one but two Frankenstein-related films! Welcome to your moviegoing guide to…

January 2, 2025