News & Updates

Lil Yachty Files Suit Accusing NFT Seller of ‘Maliciously’ Using His Likeness to Raise Millions

Rapper’s trademark infringement lawsuit claims Opulous used his name and likeness to raise more than $6.5 million in venture capital funds without an agreement

Published by

Lil Yachty filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against NFT seller Opulous on Thursday, claiming the company “maliciously” used his name and likeness to raise more than $6.5 million in venture capital funds.

The rapper, born Miles Parks McCollum, states in the filing that he only engaged in a couple of exploratory conference calls with the Singapore-based company in May 2021 that included Opulous founder Lee Parsons, the CEO of Ditto Music. In the suit, he states “no agreement or deal terms” were reached, and he never saw a dime of the money raised.

Nevertheless, on June 2, 2021, Opulous issued a press release claiming its upcoming “series of unmissable NFT drops” would be “led by world-famous artists including Lil Yachty,” according to the lawsuit. The materials for the “media blitz” included a photo of Lil Yachty, the complaint states.

Opulous and Parsons “maliciously utilized the alleged affiliation and involvement of plaintiff as their flagship artist partnership to successfully raise substantial venture capital funds — represented as over $6.5 million — yet never remitted any monies to plaintiff,” the lawsuit claims.

NFTs, or non-fungible tokens, are described in the complaint as “unique pieces of digital content linked to the blockchain, which is the digital database underpinning cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum.” The tokens each have a “unique” identity, allowing them to be bought, sold and traded, it says.

The lawsuit further states Opulous purports to sell ownership interests in musicians’ copyrighted work to the public at large, using NFTs as the means by which the ownership interest is transferred and maintained.

“Of course, it is axiomatic that in order to offer the ownership interest to any musician’s copyrighted work, defendant, Opulous, must first have the agreement and consent of the musician at issue to sell the copyright to his or her work, with the musician in turn entitled to a share of the proceeds from the sale thereof,” the lawsuit filed in federal court in Los Angeles states.

Parsons did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Rolling Stone.

“Defendant’s willful and intentional acts of unfair competition and false advertisement have caused and continue to cause great and irreparable injury and damage to plaintiff’s business and goodwill,” the complaint seeking unspecified damages claims.

From Rolling Stone US.

Recent Posts

Jackson Wang Is Done Being a People-Pleaser in His New Single ‘GBAD’

Jackson Wang's ‘GBAD’ is a powerful artistic statement on the importance of boundary-setting as a…

March 28, 2025

Studio Ghibli’s Miyazaki Rejects AI, But the Internet Won’t Stop Recreating His World Anyway

AI tools recreating Ghibli’s signature style are merely a symptom of a larger AI slop…

March 28, 2025

Inside The Five-City Tour That Wants to Bring Boundary-Pushing Rock Back

The third edition of Prog Encounters features performances ranging from Mumbai-based act Daira, Bengaluru prog…

March 28, 2025

Shruti Haasan is Reinventing Her Favourite Tamil Classics For New Show in Hyderabad

The singer-songwriter and actor is adapting her favorite Tamil classics with darker, heavier renditions, bringing…

March 28, 2025

Patti Smith Has the Power: See Bruce Springsteen, Michael Stipe, Karen O Salute Icon at Tribute Show

Stars of alt-rock, classic rock and stage and screen assemble in New York to salute…

March 28, 2025

Newbeat’s Debut Album ‘Raw and Rad’ Is the Only Introduction They Need

Each track on the full-length album offers a glimpse into Newbeat’s evolving story, capturing contrasting…

March 27, 2025